The Buzz on Dianetics

Dianetics for Dummies

I couldn't ever before not wish to receive anything that enters your mind for you- if it was or else, I would not be sitting below with you, doing this. I not just might never have an issue, or not want to hear something that comes to mind for you, yet I'm totally eager to know every idea, every idea, every image or sensation that emerges or materializes for you- do not ever before think otherwise, and if somehow you do, please just allow me recognize! Sometimes, you may have an idea, and picture, idea or event pop up that does not seem to answer the concern, or connect to it, but nonetheless, always do tell me concerning it, and as we proceed, the significance will arise for you.


This is fundamental in the basis of processing, and the subject of this conversation: the fundamental duties of the therapist and the client: The standard role of the counselor is, as opposed to "basic training", not to control, which indicates to impose and/or inhibit, but to rather work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CLIENT.


In subjective handling, whatever was stated in one's training materials, the processor is not there "to manage" the customer. On the contrary, the processor exists to grant the client the liberty and undistracted emphasis to process and express what manifests, and what manifests is what arises when the customer attends to the material that connects to their own goals for the processing, and for their life.

4 Simple Techniques For Dianetics

John Mcmasters expressed this basic truth splendidly well in among his lectures on Power processing, in which he describes exactly how he was asked what this "unique knack" was that he had for providing such great sessions; he had to consider that for a minute, and detected that it was what he had not been doing, as well as what he was doing: he wasn't assessing, evaluating, computing, or as a matter of fact, producing any thoughts, let alone verbal expressions, after giving the command and while waiting for the PC to finish their answer to their contentment; he was, just and only, existing with the computer, and entirely interested.




The role of the therapist, showed; that was his "unique propensity". I have actually had my own experience which educated me this well, extremely beforehand in the game. In 1982, having just recently completed my training and teaching fellowship on New Period Dianetics, I was running this on a PC, and there was a point in the session where (being a little bit wet behind the ears not yet having numerous hours under my belt as an expert auditor) the PC appeared to be "taking also long" to share anything vocally after I provided him a command.


This key became one of the most beneficial payment that John ever before made to the subject of treatment or auditing (Dianetics). In my modest viewpoint, it is the best contribution that any individual has ever before made to these subjectsthe application is entirely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and lacking any kind of tip, guidance or opinion.no preconditioned program for individuals, or 'degrees' that they need to do


In Idenics, the only resource of information about a customer is the private client. In Scientology we prided ourselves on not assessing for people. All that really indicated was that the auditor did not Vocally review for the Computer in session. The registrars and principles police officers evaluated for the PC.

The Buzz on Dianetics

The Scientology Bridge is very evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we chalked up the distinction in results to John's improvisational abilities and experience. However, upon further examination, specific aspects pertained to lightIt was not an issue of what he WAS doing that the various other experts weren't, however rather what he WASN'T doing that they were.


Anyone who had actually ever seen John audit might not help but notice an one-of-a-kind quality in his auditing."The client's standard function is to be there with the purpose of moving in the instructions of their spiritual objectives, and to openly and fully share and experience whatever materializes for them in answering the inquiries and implementing the directions in the handling.


This is something to procedure as needed. However also, individuals often have previous experience and/or brainwashing in auditing/processing which, somehow, and to some degrees, actually misdirects them into attitudes, concepts and actions patterns that stop the full understanding of these duties, therefore they will certainly tend to inhibit the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the instances offered over. * The initial, and maybe leading examples of mis-indoctrination other causing much less than totally smooth and reliable sessions, can be discovered in certain facets of the training regimens, or "TR's":"TR's" are usually a person's first, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will go on to explain what I view as the flaws in principle and practice, nonetheless, often tend to be greatly best site restorative, done as they are given (Hubbard firmly insists that "TR's are not processing, they are educating", however factually, they are both handling AND training)


Alan Walter made similar observations, and enhanced on these with his "Existence Processes". There is no "flunking", and no denial of the truth of this being processing. The focus, as it needs to be, is on experiencing the various other person's presence. All the symptoms which get a "flunk" in doing "TR-0" are simply the being's initiatives to resist the other individual's presence, and instead of being bothered and badgered with "Flunk", which imposes "failing!" on the being, one simply needs to be encouraged to "stick their feet in the water a little deeper", to significantly restore their capability and willingness to fully share and experience "being below", or "visibility", with others.

See This Report on Dianetics

I wait up until the client considers me as if to state "I'm done answering, over to you, what's following?" As long as the client is looking in other places than back at the counselor, they are still processing the question or command. Remember "a quiet auditor welcomes itsa"; the client is still refining, till image source their interest plainly returns to the counselor.